Warning Dog Owners

Thursday, October 13, 2016


Russian ultra-nationalist politician and political ally of Putin, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia has stated in an interview with Reuters that if the US presidential candidate Donald Trump does not come to power, there will be a nuclear war with Russia.
"Americans should elect Donald Trump as president next month or prepare for a nuclear war , " said Zhirinovsky, a radical politician known for its high - sounding declarations.
Vladimir Zhirinovsky
Vladimir Zhirinovsky
In the words of Russian politician, known for his strong rhetoric, "the Republican candidate is the only person able to calm tensions between Moscow and Washington triggered by various issues such as the current crisis in Syria."
"On the contrary, the former Secretary of State and current rival Trump, ie Democrat Hillary Clinton, could trigger a Third World War , " says Zhirinovsky, an ally of President Vladimir Putin during an interview published on Wednesday.
For this Russian lawmaker whose party finished third in the last parliamentary elections, "relations between Russia and the United States can not be worse. The only way they can get worse is if a war begins. "
Vladimir Zhirinovsky
Those who vote next November 8 in the US "must realize that they are voting for peace on Earth" if they choose to Trump. But if the polls give victory to Democratic candidate "is war. It will be a short film. Hiroshimas and Nagasakis be everywhere. "
Zhirinovsky says that if the tycoon comes to power, US It moves away from what is happening in Ukraine or Syria and Iraq. However, "Clinton is a dangerous person." With her US will continue to intervene in affairs of other countries. "She could start a nuclear war" remarks.
Hillary Clinton
It is not the only warning in this direction.
In August, economist, writer and political analyst Paul Craig Roberts, similarly warned ...
"A vote for Hillary is a vote for a nuclear war. If Hillary slips into the Oval Office, I predict a nuclear war before the end of his first term. A vote for Hillary is a vote for a nuclear war "
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts
"We know that Hillary, like Bill, is a liar. We know that Hillary is a warmonger. We know that Hillary made the most irresponsible statement ever uttered by a presidential candidate when he said that the Russian president was the 'new Hitler', bringing tensions between the US and Russia to a higher level than the level of the Cold War. We know that Hillary is allied with the neocons and their belief in the ideology of global US hegemony can lead to a war with Russia and China "
Another official has warned about the dangerous course of events, is the Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmus, who said that "The world is on the brink of a global war"
Numan Kurtulmus
Numan Kurtulmus
"The Syrian conflict has become a" proxy war "between the two superpowers of the Cold War, Russia and the United States. If this war continues subsidiary United States and Russia will come to war. The world is on the verge of a major regional or global war. "
Regarding this possible "nuclear war" with which both are threatened for months, recent news that does not invite precisely tranquility.
Russia successfully fired three intercontinental ballistic missiles in one day. The Russian Armed Forces have been three successful launches of long - range ballistic missiles as part of tests combativeness of the Strategic Missile Forces designation. The launches were made from various parts of the country.
Russian Armed Forces
On the other hand, as reported by the web Sputnik ...
The Secretary General of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, during the conference of European security in Berlin, said the Alliance begins a tactic to intimidate Russia is planning to strengthen the infrastructure and deploy a new type of warhead near Russia 's borders.
Previously, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) reported that the US had successfully tested nuclear-capable pumps B61-7 and B61-11 modernized.
Experts do not rule out that these weapons are deployed on NATO bases in Europe by 2020, which would significantly increase the military capability of the Alliance. In addition, the Pentagon chief Ashton Carter said on more than one occasion that such measures are termed counterweight to the alleged "aggressive ambitions of Russia".
The deployment of such a precise weapon in Europe is a serious problem for Moscow.
The director of the Nuclear Information Project of the Federation of American Scientists, Hans Kristensen, said "the NNSA is developing the first bomb controlled freefall for installation on aircraft multipurpose fighter F-35", which, in turn will enter service in the air bases of the Alliance in the Baltics in 2020.
As he added, "it is the largest nuclear modernization of NATO since the 80s".
To reach military headquarters and the Ministry of Russians from bases in the Baltic region Defense, US fighters will not need more than a few minutes.
Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov, said that the B61-12 bomb is a weapon of dual-use: can be used as an element of strategic weapons launched from heavy bombers and as a non-strategic nuclear warhead launched from tactical aircraft.
"The US plans are provocative nature and contradict Washington's claims about its commitment to nuclear disarmament , " said the expert.
Of course, in these circumstances Russia is obliged to prepare countermeasures aimed at upgrading the air defense systems on its western borders.
However, the Ministry of Defense of the country could consider deploying its military bases in the countries where he had had in the past, including Vietnam and Cuba. "Our fighter bombers in Cuba worry much the US and Washington will call us to negotiate to demote threat, both in the Baltics and in the Caribbean , "said military expert Yuri Netkáchev.
As we can see, it's amazing the ease with which lately there is talk of "nuclear war".
But perhaps the problem is that we believe that nuclear war is impossible because we think of old schemes based on the mutual destruction of the contenders.
A10 nuclear WEAPON
And perhaps the nuclear war that is "planning", will focus on the use of artifacts tactical value, intended to destroy certain infrastructures of the enemy, in what would be nothing more than the extension of a conventional war.
If this were the case, then we would have a war planned by both sides, in which "certain rules of engagement would be respected".
At this point, it is difficult to settle between the real threat and what is merely verbiage posture or threatening one another.
Anyway, those who pay the consequences, be us ...

Generally, in this blog I limit myself to expose information drawn from networks and from different areas, often accompanied by own analysis; but rarely I expose the inner feelings that the news produced me personally, beyond all reason.
But in this case I'll make an exception and will discuss what I feel, hoping that some of the readers do the same and express (if desired), what are your feelings about the conflict which we live.
I know what I will say then many readers may seem them directly stupid or crazy.
But for some reason that I can not define by rational parameters, I have the intimate feeling that WE ARE TAKING THE HAIR. For more laps than I give, I can not remove this feeling inside me.
Perhaps it is self-deception, maybe it's because I do not want to accept the possibility that we may end up living a great war in a few months or years.
But there is a little voice in my head that does not want to shut up and telling me that everything we are living (despite the thousands of deaths and destruction that are taking place), has a lot of imposture. On both sides.
It's as if everyone had agreed to give fear to the population.
I'm not going to cheat: I have no rational explanation for this personal feeling and everything I see or hear, it points precisely in the opposite direction. Therefore, I can be very wrong with it.
But I can not help feeling that there is a hidden aspect to all this growing conflict. It is as if this possible world war, was a pretext for another kind of maneuver that we do not expect. As if we threatened with a great conflict that "will destroy everything" so late shows "a solution" perhaps conveyed through some kind of "phenomenon or event" to finally accept the "proposed solution" as the "only option to save us from catastrophe."
I know many think of "arrivals of UFOs and aliens," "antichrists falling from sky" and other "fantasies" deftly inoculated networks in recent years.
I do not know if the shots go out there or not (I have already talked about a possible alien contact orchestrated in previous articles, as a hypothesis). Lately also we receive a constant barrage of information about the colonization of Mars.
But perhaps everything could be offered via something much more mundane and less fanciful.
I repeat: I know that makes no sense, because all the evidence and evidence points in another direction.
But is there anyone else have the feeling that all this threat of a third world war is nothing but an orchestrated maneuver and actually we are preparing for "something"?

No comments:

Post a Comment