Warning Dog Owners

Monday, November 21, 2016


It seems that the wars to come, will be produced by controlling the most essential good for humans, the great treasure that has always surrounded us and the more valuable in the future: water.
And technological development is leading us to a world where oil will be replaced by new, much more efficient, clean, cheap and easily accessible technologies and energy sources.
However, water can not be replaced ... at least for the moment. And so, that crucial good, will be more valuable than gold.
For that reason, major banks and global financial powers are competing for possession of aquifers, as indicated in Article WORLD ALARM: BIG BANKS take over ALL WATER PLANET
Water Extinction
In this regard, we reproduce an interesting article by Kerry Bolton, originally appeared on the website Katehon, a Think Tank linked to the Kremlin.
This article highlights future geopolitical strategies around the vast Indian and Pacific area and the possible great war that may occur in this vast region for the control of aquifers.

The global oligarchy has long recognized the importance of the Pacific in strategic and economic planning. In recent years there has been a convergence of Russia, China and the US. In the Pacific, as they all try to extend their influence in the region. The US oligarchy And its allies have an initial advantage of decades. The objectives of this oligarchy do not necessarily coincide with the assumptions of other sectors of the United States' power complex, including the military and the Senate. Where the military and certain political influences see threats, the oligarchy sees opportunities, especially with regard to China.
Second War World
The USA. Have long sought to co-opt China into a global system. Despite the noise of sabers at times, there is no indication that this picture has changed.
Obama agree to reduce military risks
The difference in the attitude of the US Towards Russia and China is not difficult to discern, despite any boxing shadows there may be on the world stage. In short: the USA. Aspire to "reform" in China, which has been developing for several decades, while for Russia under Putin, the United States. Are convinced that there must be a "change of regime", and pursue this goal with ardor.
The scandalous attempts to demonize Putin are comparable to those used against Gaddafi, Milosevic, Saddam and now Assad. The public relations offensive against Putin is the same one used as a prelude to the subsidiary wars and "color revolutions" that have brought down a number of statesmen throughout the former Soviet Union, North Africa, and in other places. You do not see such an offensive against China's leadership; And did not even occur under Mao, who was considered as a willing partner to surround Russia. Carl Gershman, whose Russophobia comes from a Trotskyist fund, as in many others, head of the National Endowment for Democracy, who has been a key instigator of "regime change" around the world and is funded by the US Congress, has recently called Putin removal from the US .. (Robert Parry, "Regime change in Russia: Key Neocon calls for Washington to remove President Putin form office", Global Research, October 7, 2016; http : //www.globalresearch.ca/regime-change-in-russia-key-neocon-calls-on-washington-to-remove-president-putin-from-office/5550248 ).
Putin removal from the US
The American and Allied oligarchies established the Asia Society for the promotion of a regional economic bloc of the Pacific. The Asia Society was founded in 1956 by John D. Rockefeller III.
The headline on the website of the Asia Society is: "Preparing Asians and Americans for a shared future" [ "Preparing Asians and Americans for a shared future" (Asia Society, "About", http: //www.asiasociety .org / about / mission.html ). Another such political group is the Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973, again by the Rockefeller dynasty, whose first director is the Russophobic Zbigniew Brzezinski.
An "Asian Pacific Group" of the commission was established, reflecting the growing interest in the region. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement was designed to formalize the regionalization of the Pacific.(See Bolton, "Globalists' Pacific Agenda", Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific, Black House Publishing, London, 2013, 138-144; and Bolton, "Regional Globalization: The Trans Pacific Partnership, 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/11/19/regional-globalization-the-trans-pacific-partnership/ ).
USA and China Flags
These economic strategies are reinforced by the US military. However, China has also entered the region with the approach of helping the numerous Pacific Island nations, and more recently, also Russia has expanded its presence.
The Lowy Institute, a globalist think tank based in Australia, founded by veteran Zionist tycoon Frank Lowy, says of China:
"The People's Republic of China (PRC) has a strong and growing commitment in the Pacific Islands region. Currently, China has diplomatic relations with eight countries - the Cook Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Niue, Papua New Guinea (PNG), Samoa, Tonga and Vanuatu. The region has witnessed a very active "checkbook diplomacy" in the past, since Taiwan also has six diplomatic allies in the Pacific. Open 'checkbook diplomacy' came largely to an end in 2008 when the president of Taiwan, Ma Ying-jeou, reached a truce with Beijing after promising Taiwan no longer compete with China by the Allies in the Pacific. ( China and the Pacific Island " http://www.lowyinstitute.org/issues/china-pacific ).
Russia has lagged behind in the region. This presence is centered in Fiji, until then a focus of China, since New Zealand, Australia, the European Union and the USA. Tried to play as a big brother by punishing Fijians for their lack of liberal democracy and imposing sanctions. If the USWere serious in counteracting Chinese influence in the region, such a move would be unthinkable. The efforts of the USSR to secure positions in Tonga and Western Samoa failed.
However, in January 2016, 20 Russian arms containers arrived in Suva, Fiji, causing much speculation as to whether this is the beginning of a Russian diplomatic offensive to establish a presence among the Pacific states in a part of the World that is symbolically considered the "weak point" of the West. (Roman Madaus, "The Bear Returns to the South Pacific: Russia Sends Arms to Fiji", The Diplomat, April 9, 2016, http://thediplomat.com/2016/04/the-bear-returns-to-the -South-pacific-russia-sends-arms-to-fiji / ).
Russia Sends Arms to Fiji
In July 2016, the annual Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) was held under the auspices of the United States. It should be noted that China was present;The great absentee was Russia. However, even in Mongolia, an area of ​​direct Russian interest, a multinational US-sponsored military wargaming exercise was held in 2015, which also included China, but excluded Russia. (Bolton, US Navy Rim of The Pacific (RIMPAC) War Games, Co-opting China, Isolating Russia? ", Global Research, July 10, 2016, http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-sponsored-rim-of -the-pacific-rimpac-war-games-coopting-china-isolating-russia / 5535240 ).
War Games
Future conflicts in the Indo-Pacific region will be on or through the influence of water resources. Since this author wrote on the subject in 2010 (Bolton, "Water Wars: Rivalry Over Water Resources," World Affairs, Vol. 14, No. 1, Spring 2010; and Bolton, "Rivalry over Water Resources as a Potential Cause of Conflict in Asia ", Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, Spring 2010, 23-44, http://search.proquest.com/openview/4daabb344fd4e09d9a7e705c541eea15/1?pq-origsite = gscholar ) the issue of "water wars" has been under increasing attention. For example, Lieutenant Colonel H. Jin Pak, US military professor. Wrote on the subject in The US Army War College Journal Parameters, concluding: 
"As water becomes more and more desired among states in that region, and even across the world, it is time for the United States and the Department of Defense to raise environmental security issues on a par with National security interests such as the fight against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the prevention of attacks against the territory.It is increasingly important to promote confidence-building measures among certain states to ensure that military mistakes do not aggravate issues of territorial sovereignty, such as that covered by Arunachal Pradesh. Finally, it is time for the Department of Defense to invest in more water purification / treatment capacity, not only focusing on maintaining the health of the United States and coalition forces, but also on mitigating crises of scarcity water. " (Pak, "China, India and War over Water" Parameters, Vol. 46, No. 2, Summer 2016, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/issues/Summer_2016/8_Pak.pdf)

Water Ball
As well as securing oil resources, the idea is that the rivalry for water resources could justify the US To take charge of the water resources of States for the sake of peace. Will we soon find US and other corporations controlling water resources after US military intervention, and ultimatums for the privatization of water resources to allow corporate control? Will "color revolutions" be used against states that insist on maintaining control over water resources?
Such conflicts over water are especially problematic in the whole of the Indo-Pacific region, with China controlling the headwaters in Tibet. This is also a question that could confuse Russian-Chinese relations, Israeli responses to water control, and water problems in the United States.With the exhaustion of the water tables. The destruction of Serbia was caused by military means in order to obtain the mineral resources of Kosovo, in particular the mining complex of Trepca, with privatization being one of the ultimatums to Serbia of primary war to allow the corporative control of the resources Kosovo, according to the Rambouillet diktat of tax to the state (See: Privatization Agency of Kosovo, http://www.pak-ks.org/?page=2,1 ). Wars will be waged by water, as opium, gold and oil have waged, and as has systematically occurred when globalists have intervened for the sake of "humanity," and the result will be permanent chaos.

In this regard, it is also worth noting the news that appeared on the RT website these days, which refers to the possible outbreak of a potential (even nuclear) war between India and Pakistan.
The first nuclear conflict on Earth could erupt between India and Pakistan due to growing tensions between the two countries over access to potable water in the Indian subcontinent and conflicts around the waters of the Indus River, of the United Nations.
The Indus river basin is a "time bomb" that can explode at any time, as rising water shortages in the region could lead to irreversible changes in climate and increase tensions between India and Pakistan, two countries with arsenals Nuclear weapons at its disposal, Vladimir Smajtin, director of the United Nations Institute for Water, Environment and Health in Hamilton, Canada, tells the RIA Novosti agency.
Keran Village Neelam Valley
According to the scientist, the conflict over water resources in the Indian subcontinent has intensified in recent years and reached its peak a month ago, when India announced its intention to revise the treaty on the waters of the Indus, which since 1960 Regulates the exploitation of the river by the two countries. Pakistan considered this action by India as a hostile act and declared that it would interpret the cancellation of the treaty by its neighbor as "a declaration of war".
UN experts indicate that climate change is gradually reducing the volume of water from the Indus River, a problem aggravated by growing water consumption in two neighboring countries of India and Pakistan: China and Afghanistan.
According to scientists, the Indus and other rivers in South Asia will be most affected by climate change and their consequences in the form of droughts and chronic water shortages will soon wreak havoc in the region.
water consumption
They emphasize that the lack of water and the cuts in their supply would lead to internal political instability in both countries, especially in Pakistan, a country that already consumes a large amount of water and whose political system is on the verge of what can be Consider "a failed state".
Robert Wirsing, one of the authors of the report, notes that the long history of conflict between the three nuclear powers of the region (Pakistan, India and China) indicates that the predictions of the dynamics of the possible conflict will be extremely negative and that in the coming Years will increase the likelihood of conflict, in particular a nuclear conflict.

The essential objective of the elites, and especially for the future, has not been to accumulate money (something that can be created from the air and has a relative value, based on trust). The real goal of the elites is to gain full control over natural resources, ownership of arable land and food supply, oil (less and less), energy sources, minerals and critical infrastructures These same elites fund. And to get this control over what really has value, they have used debt. Money and debt, then, are instruments, not ends in themselves.
The Elites
But this instrument, as it has been exploited until now, is increasingly outdated and will no longer have room in the new system.
Now, let's head to a world where central banks and big omnipotent bankers will no longer be needed ... and the elites who truly control everything, know it well and are making the right preparations for the transition, which promises to be traumatic, Because not only old systems, but a whole world, must be torn down to build a new one. 
Those old bankers, who for so many years have shaped us like pigs, with their potbellies, their cigars and their top hats, are about to leave forever ... but not because we have defeated them, but because they will change their disguise and be replaced by New control icons.

Unfortunately, when they begin to imprison great bankers and see heads roll unattainable, there will be many people who will believe that the world is changing and that the people have won a victory. When in fact, it will be the same elites who will be directing the metamorphosis ...

No comments:

Post a Comment