Warning Dog Owners

Monday, December 26, 2016


Turkish newspapers are openly blaming the CIA and the "Western Alliance" on the front pages of their newspapers for the murder of Russian ambassador to Turkey, Andrei Karlov.
murder of Russian ambassador
This occurs while Turkish President Erdogan (who incidentally chases and imprisons the press contrary to his designs) said: "I think this is an attack on Turkey, the Turkish state and the Turkish people, and also a clear provocation ... In terms of Turkish-Russian relations. I am sure that our Russian friends also see this fact. Both Turkey and Russia are willing not to be deceived by this provocation. "
Russian President Vladimir Putin similarly responded by saying: "This murder is clearly a provocation aimed at undermining the improvement and normalization of Russian-Turkish relations ..."
Frantz Klintsevich, deputy chairman of the upper chamber of the Russian parliament's defense and security committee, told reporters: "It is very likely that representatives of the NATO secret services will be behind this murder."
Well, following the logic inherent in the narrative of the facts, everything would point out that indeed pro-Western forces (whether the CIA, Mossad, or Persian Gulf states) would be behind the assassination.
Recall also that immediately after the attack, the Turkish government was already linking the assassin Mevlüt Mert Altintas with the movement FETO, the organization of the Islamic preacher Fethullah Gulen which the Turkish authorities blame for the attempted coup.
Turkish authorities blame for the attempted
In this respect, new information has spread, which we find in Sputnik ...
Turkish investigators uncovered links between Mevlut Mert Altintas, the murderer of the Russian ambassador in Ankara, and several police officers suspended after the failed coup last July, Anadolu news agency reports.
According to a police source quoted by the Turkish agency, experts from the Prosecutor's Office of Ankara and the Police Department analyzed data from Altintas mobile and established that it was in contact with eight users of ByLock, an application to send encrypted messages.
This program is used by members of the so-called FETO, the organization of the Islamic preacher Fethullah Gulen, which the Turkish authorities blame for the attempted coup.
Anadolu needs among the users of the application with whom he was in contact Altintas were five policemen, a commissioner and his assistant and one other person.

And apparently the implication of the Gülen movement in the assassination could begin to lead to strong pressure from Turkey and Russia to extradite the CIA-backed opposition cleric and dismantle their entire network.
That's how they tell us on Hispan TV ...
Russia could demand US The extradition of Turkish dissident leader Fethullah Gülen in connection with the assassination of his ambassador to Turkey.
While further research on the killing of Russian ambassador to Turkey Andrei Karlov on Monday, a senior source in the Turkish presidency told the local daily Daily Sabah on Thursday that Russia will discuss Gülen's extradition request once Completed.
Russian ambassador to Turkey Andrei Karlov
"The Russians are convinced that FETÖ (terrorist organization Fethulá Gülen, the name with which Ankara designates the gülenista brotherhood) is behind the assassination of the Russian ambassador. The Russian side may also initiate Gülen's extradition process from the United States , "the source said.
According to the source, who preferred anonymity, this means a "global war against FETÖ" and that Washington will no longer be able to continue to ignore the request from both Turkey and Russia.

Well, following the logic inherent in the narrative of the facts, everything would point out that indeed pro-Western forces (whether the CIA, Mossad, or Persian Gulf states) would be behind the assassination.
In fact, a great part of the public opinion is intuited that this belief is quite a majority, at least among those who feel a certain proximity to the Russian side and usually follow their means. And obviously, that is what is believed in the mainstream of alternative Internet media.
Therefore, it is easy to get on this car and follow the current without question.
But we must have a critical spirit and ask questions about this attack, as we did in the previous attacks in Paris, Belgium and other European countries.
To begin with, let's look at the tempo of the narrative.
As you can see, all the pieces fit perfectly: they assassinate the Russian ambassador, two hours later the Turkish government accuses Gülen of the murder, Russia joins the accusations and within a few hours it begins to hint that the extradition of the cleric will be requested.
Recall that Gülen is a CIA protégé
Recall that Gülen is a CIA protégé, whose extradition would mean humiliation for the US and a serious blow to his credibility, since the US would not only accept to have given support to an alleged coup and murderer, but would also prove that he is not capable To offer protection or coverage to its allies and collaborators. And that would mean that less and less people would be willing to "work with the US and the CIA" , because at the slightest Russian pressure or a country with a certain weight, would betray their collaborators and abandon them to their fate. This would undermine the CIA's ability to influence and recruit abroad.
Therefore, the United States should refuse, as far as possible, to extradite Gülen, so as not to be humiliated and not to impair his ability to influence international politics.
And then what will be the Russian-Turkish response, if the US refuses to surrender its protege?
You can already intuit: that Turkey will begin to move away from NATO, backed by a Russia "deeply hurt" by the murder of its ambassador and ready to offer full coverage to the government of Erdogan, "the evil criminal interference of America that respects nothing " .
To all this, the main maneuvers occur when Obama is still president of the USA, so that Trump can blame the previous administration of all the disaster and be free of all responsibility.
Do you see the possible play?
Obviously, what we are saying, can be approached from two different points of view:
FIRST: Either the attack has been perpetrated by the West (through FETO or whoever), or SECOND: this is a false Turkish-Russian flag operation, in order to justify the geo-strategic maneuver mentioned above.
At the moment, both possibilities are plausible.
However, we reiterate our doubts about some aspects of the assassination of Ambassador Kárlov.
We continue to think that it is strange that they did not detect the links of the assassin Mevlüt Mert Altintas with the FETO movement for months and that, just two hours after the murder, the mayor of Ankara had left the links. It seems the Turkish-Russian version of "finding the passport of the terrorists in the places where they carry out the attacks" , as for example, has happened again in the attack with truck in the Christmas market of Berlin.
The terrorist who kill Andrey karlov
Taking into account the generalized purges carried out by Erdogan in the country after the coup attempt, it is striking that they did not detect this policeman, who was communicating with other members of FETO.
Andrey karlov dead by terrorist
But what remains unexplained is that Ambassador Karlov was unprotected.
It is true that Putin has come to the fore and justified Russia's failure to protect its ambassador:
"Security to diplomats is provided only in the territory of the Embassy," said Russian President Vladimir Putin, explaining the absence of armed escorts near the Russian ambassador in Turkey, Andrei Kárlov, on the day of the assassination.
putin and territory of the Embassy
But let's not fool ourselves: this does not explain why Turkey did not protect such a prominent figure as the Russian ambassador, after two days of demonstrations at the Russian embassy calling for revenge against Russia by Aleppo and after more than 400 bombings in one year and a half. And all this, knowing that Gülen's forces could seek such an attack and that the US and other countries would do anything to break the still fragile Russian-Turkish alliance.
Whatever they say, no matter how you look at it, it is VERY SUSPICIOUS that neither Turks nor Russians properly protected Ambassador Kárlov. Turkey is not New Zealand, where peace and tranquility reign, but a state at war, whipped by terrorism and therefore, it is absolutely illogical for Karlov to attend a public act with no protection.
And this is the point that makes us suspect all the narrative that is unfolding before us.
However, we only have that: suspicions.
We do not know what is really happening, nor do we know who is behind this murder.
At the moment, it is so rational to support the idea that the US or its allies are behind the assassination to weaken the Turkish-Russian alliance, as to suspect the details surrounding the attack.
Perhaps the best option is to wait for events ...


Comments - Rules and Conditions - No bullying or harassment of fellow commenters. Keep it civil! - No foul language or obscenities, please. - No posting of external links. - No sex, gambling, alcohol, cigar or sames comments allow.

Saturday, December 3, 2016


Cyclically, we are getting news, published both in alternative media and in mass media, which point in the direction of a possible terrorist attack with nuclear or radioactive devices.
The intention behind this malicious news, we do not know if it is sowing fear among the population (unlikely, because people are too dumb with their mobile or TV to be alarmed by anything that is not visible, tangible or immediate) or Although it tries to inoculate the idea in the public imaginary so that it is accepted as a plausible and acceptable reality, in the event that it occurs. Something like "we had already warned".
The issue is that we have new news about a robbery of radioactive material, although this time, it would not be a simple geological or industrial device, but directly from a dangerous element coming from a nuclear plant.
Radioactive terrorist attack
As pointed out by the Jerusalem Post newspaper, echoing information from the Arabic newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat (based in London and whose intentions are obscure, as we will say later), Iranian nuclear material would have been stolen and with it could be make a "dirty bomb".

Radioactive material produced at the Iranian nuclear plant at Bushehr was reportedly reportedly stolen, raising concerns about making a dirty bomb in the future.

The identity of the alleged thieves remains unknown.

dirty bomb lab
The missing material, Iridium-192, was reported to the International Atomic Energy Agency by the Iranian nuclear regulator earlier this month, warning Gulf neighbors of its potentially harmful use.
A dirty bomb, or radiological dispersion device, is a conventional weapon equipped with nuclear material. The idea behind a dirty bomb is the spread of highly toxic and polluting radioactive materials in the area around the blast.
Citing Saudi intelligence sources, Asharq al-Awsat reported Friday that the Iridium-192 was stolen when it was being transported from the Bushehr facility. The vehicle carrying the nuclear material was later found abandoned with its contents seized.
It is not clear who stole nuclear material and why.
In this regard, it should be noted that the Iranian media Tehran Times argues that the information is not correct.
According to the Iranian publication, based on an anonymous source, the stolen material was actually an iridium-192 camera, used to make X-rays in the city of Ahvaz, capital of the southwestern province of Khuzestan.
The issue, however, is that the news about the theft of Iridium-192 has run through the networks and has been given for certain in multiple media.
The IAEA defines Iridium-192, a highly unstable isotope that emits electrons and gamma rays, as a Category 2 radioactive substance. Substances with Category 2 classification may permanently damage or even kill a human being if exposed to the material in question Of hours or days.
Iridium-192 is generally used in the field of industry, used to locate faults in metallic components, despite the danger it poses to humans.
In July 2015, Iran and six world powers (Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States plus Germany) reached a nuclear agreement on the country's nuclear program.
The agreement, which came into force in January, requires Iran to dispose of most of its nuclear waste in exchange for lifting international sanctions in the country's energy and financial sectors. In addition, Iran undertakes to allow regular inspections of facilities within the country.
Earlier this month, the UN nuclear watchdog said Iran must stop repeatedly overcoming a limit on its stock of sensitive material established by the historic agreement.
The IAEA, which is monitoring the agreement, said in a report in early November that Iran had slightly exceeded the 130-metric limit of its heavy water stock for the second time since the agreement was launched in January.
UN nuclear watchdog
The issue is that as the website Veterans Today (VT) indicates in reference to this news, there are suspicious elements that do not invite optimism.
To begin with, according to VT, the source of the news, the Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper is an Arabic-language newspaper published in London, considered as a piece of propaganda to the direct order of the Saudi royal family dedicated to disseminating disinformation.
In this case, the misinformation is intended to relate Iran's nuclear activities to a theft of dangerous material, a step prior to what could be a false flag attack with such radioactive material and which could even lead to blaming the Iranians for Or at least its nuclear program.
This would make some sense, in the light of new circumstances around Iran: apart from its usual enemies of Saudi Arabia, Israel or Qatar, now Iran will have to deal with a new and bitter enemy in the White House, the Trump administration, ready To complete the work long designed by the elites and consisting of attacking or invading several countries in the area, culminating with the largest and most powerful of them: Iran.
But perhaps we should not consider this news as isolated, but as part of a larger campaign, undertaken by a variety of different media.
Improvised Nuclear Device
And, the news was published in the Asharq Al-Awsat on November 25 and in the Jerusalem Post on November 27. But curiously, on November 27, and without apparent relation to the news, on the North American web The National Interest, appeared a broad article that tried to convince the reader to learn an acronym and to incorporate to its vocabulary: IND.
IND means "Improvised Nuclear Device" (Improvised Nuclear Device), which are defined as pump devices similar handcrafting to IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices) but with elements and materials from nuclear weapons.
The issue is that The National Interest website provided a comprehensive explanation of these terrorist devices, warning readers that they should start ringing them because they would soon hear of them because of a possible terrorist attack.
Improvised Explosive Devices
Two days later, RT's website was responsible for reproducing the same propaganda for its Spanish-speaking readers, in what is no more than a propaganda effort, in this case of Russia, to justify any Russian intervention against terrorism in The foreigner and at home (and on the 30th did Sputnik) ... exactly as American propaganda has always done.
And is that the moment of truth, as the manipulation of the term "terrorism" means to justify the most dirty tricks, all seem to go in the same direction.
The issue is that we have, in a few hours, a double propaganda maneuver on a possible nuclear device improvised by evil terrorists, which is spoken on websites of Arab, Israeli, North American and Russian matrix ... and add to that, alternative means Which have echoed the news, such as Veterans Today.
We are not saying that there is going to be a bomb attack with a dirty bomb (something that they insinuate more strongly in the web of VT), but we do notice that this news has an evident load of bad intentions in the respect and it points in a bad direction, At least as far as Iran's interests and balance in the region are concerned.
There are many means involved in constructing a certain story, of different spheres and inclinations and that is not precisely, a news that can leave us alone ...